BPMSG

List Resources

Displaying 21 - 40 of 107 (Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography)
Parameters
List all
Order by:

Ascending
Descending
Use all checked: 
Use all displayed: 
Use all in list: 
Shiraishi, S., Obata, T., & Daigo, M. (1998). Properties of a positive reciprocal matrix and their application to AHP. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 41(3), 404–414.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 04:48:43 Asia/Singapore
Salo, A. A., & Hämäläinen, R. P. (1995). Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons. European Journal of Operational Research, 82(3), 458–475.  
Added by: Klaus D. Goepel 06 Jun 2019 01:22:20 Asia/Singapore
Salo, A. A., & Hämäläinen, R. P. (1997). On the measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, 6, 309–319.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 00:19:16 Asia/Singapore
Sabaei, D., Erkoyuncu, J., & Roy, R. (2015). A review of multi-criteria decision making methods for enhanced maintenance delivery. Procedia CIRP, 37, 30–35.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 09 Jun 2019 03:25:53 Asia/Singapore
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9–26.  
Added by: Klaus-admin 08 Jun 2019 06:52:20 Asia/Singapore
Russo, R. D. F. S. M., & Camanho, R. (2015). Criteria in AHP: a systematic review. Procedia Computer Science, 50, 1123–1132.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 18 Jun 2019 04:48:55 Asia/Singapore
Peláez, J. I., Martínez, E. A., & Vargas, L. G. (2018). Consistency in positive reciprocal matrices: an improvement in measurement methods. IEEE Access, 6, 25600–25609.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 04:47:35 Asia/Singapore
Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., & Sremac, S. (2018). A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in mcdm models: full consistency method (FUCOM). Symmetry, 10(9), 393.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 04:23:11 Asia/Singapore
Ozturk, D., & Batuk, F.2011. Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) for spatial decision problems. Samsum, Turkey: Mayis University, Department of Geomatic Engineering. [Article]  
Added by: Klaus D. Goepel 08 Jun 2019 12:14:45 Asia/Singapore
Ossadnik, W., & Kaspar, R. H. (2013). Evaluation of AHP software from a management accounting perspective. Journal of Modelling in Management, 8(3), 305–319.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 23:08:12 Asia/Singapore
Nguyen, M.-T. (2003). Some prioritisation methods for defence planning No. DSTO–GD–0356Australia: Defense science and technology organisation (DSTO).  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 09 Jun 2019 03:56:32 Asia/Singapore
Munier, N., Hontoria, E., & Jiménez-Sáez, F. (2019). Strategic approach in multi-criteria decision making: A practical guide for complex scenarios. Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG.  
Added by: Klaus-admin 05 Oct 2019 15:23:00 Asia/Singapore
Miller, G. A. (1955). The magical number seven and plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 101(2), 343–352.  
Last edited by: Klaus-admin 08 Jun 2019 09:03:39 Asia/Singapore
Meesariganda, B. R., & Ishizaka, A. (2017). Mapping verbal ahp scale to numerical scale for cloud computing strategy selection. Applied Soft Computing, 53, 111–118.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 08 Jun 2019 09:07:18 Asia/Singapore
Lundy, M., Siraj, S., & Greco, S. (2017). The mathematical equivalence of the spanning tree and row geometric mean preference vectors and its implications for preference analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 257(1), 197–208.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 08 Jun 2019 05:35:41 Asia/Singapore
Kułakowski, K., Mazurek, J., Ramík, J., & Soltys, M. (2019). When is the condition of order preservation met? European Journal of Operational Research, 227(1), 248–254.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 08 Jun 2019 05:33:29 Asia/Singapore
Kordi, M. (2008). Comparison of fuzzy and crisp analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methods for spatial multicriteria decision analysis in GIS. Unpublished Thesis Master Thesis, University of Gävle.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 01:01:40 Asia/Singapore
Koczkodaj, W. W. (2016). Pairwise comparisons rating scale paradox. In N. T. Nguyen & R. Kowalczyk (Eds), Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence Vol. 9655, (pp. 1–9).Springer.  
Last edited by: Klaus-admin 08 Jun 2019 02:18:52 Asia/Singapore
Klutho, S. (2013). Mathematical decision making: An overview of the analytic hierarchy process.  
Added by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 23:47:26 Asia/Singapore
Kazibudzki, P. T. (2013). On some discoveries in the field of scientific methods for management within the concept of analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(8), 22–30.  
Added by: Klaus-admin 05 Oct 2019 17:32:00 Asia/Singapore
1 - 20  |  21 - 40  |  41 - 60  |  61 - 80  |  81 - 100  |  101 - 107
wikindx 5.8.1 ©2019 | Total resources: 107 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: American Psychological Association (APA) | Database queries: 24 | DB execution: 0.14972 secs | Script execution: 0.83499 secs