BPMSG

List Resources

Displaying 61 - 80 of 107 (Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography)
Parameters
List all
Order by:

Ascending
Descending
Use all checked: 
Use all displayed: 
Use all in list: 
Tsyganok, V. V., Kadenko, S. V., & Andriichuk, O. V. (2016). Usage of scales with different number of grades for pair comparisons in decision support systems. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 8(1).  
Last edited by: Klaus-admin 08 Jun 2019 03:06:59 Asia/Singapore
Triantaphyllou, E. (2001). Two new cases of rank reversals when the ahp andsome of its additive variants are used that do not occurwith the multiplicative ahp. Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, 10, 11–25.  
Added by: Klaus-admin 16 Sep 2019 18:19:31 Asia/Singapore
Stoilova, S. (2019). Application of simus method for assessment alternative transport policies for container carriage. ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 898–906.  
Added by: Klaus-admin 05 Oct 2019 17:37:09 Asia/Singapore
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423.  
Last edited by: Klaus-admin 08 Jun 2019 08:49:10 Asia/Singapore
Saaty, T. L., & Ozdemir, M. S. (2003). Why the magic number plus or minus two. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38, 233–244.  
Last edited by: Klaus-admin 08 Jun 2019 09:04:26 Asia/Singapore
Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (1987). uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 32(1), 107–117.  
Last edited by: Klaus-admin 08 Jun 2019 06:15:06 Asia/Singapore
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation Vol. 287. McGraw-Hill.  
Last edited by: Klaus-admin 08 Jun 2019 08:24:33 Asia/Singapore
Russo, R. D. F. S. M., & Camanho, R. (2015). Criteria in AHP: a systematic review of literature. Information Technology and Quantitative Management, 55, 1123–1132.  
Last edited by: Klaus-admin 05 Oct 2019 17:16:59 Asia/Singapore
Rokou, E., Kirytopoulos, K., & Voulgaridou, D. 2012, Analytic network process demystified. Paper presented at IFIP WG8.3 International Conference.  
Last edited by: Klaus-admin 08 Jun 2019 08:28:44 Asia/Singapore
Rezaei, J. (2016). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method:some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126–130.  
Added by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 04:29:34 Asia/Singapore
Ramanathan, R., & Ganesh, L. S. (1995). Using AHP for resource allocation problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 80(2), 410–417.  
Added by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 07:17:41 Asia/Singapore
Mustajoki, J., Hämäläinen, R. P., & Salo, A. A. (2005). Decision support by interval SMART/SWING—incorporating imprecision in the SMART and SWING methods. Decision Sciences, 36(2), 317–339.  
Added by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 07:08:51 Asia/Singapore
Munier, N., Hontoria, E., & Jiménez-Sáez, F. (2019). Strategic approach in multi-criteria decision making: A practical guide for complex scenarios. Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG.  
Added by: Klaus-admin 05 Oct 2019 15:23:00 Asia/Singapore
Miljkovic, B., Petojevic, A., & Damljanovic, N. (2017) Newweighted sum model. University of Nis, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Filomat 31:10 . Retrieved October 5, 2019, http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat  
Added by: Klaus-admin 05 Oct 2019 17:25:51 Asia/Singapore
Lin, R., Lin, J. S.-J., Chang, J., Tang, D., Chao, H., & Julian, P. C. (2008). Note on group consistency in analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 190, 672–678.  
Added by: Klaus-admin 12 Jun 2019 01:18:36 Asia/Singapore
Lee, J. W., & Kim, S. H. (2000). Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection. Computers & Operations Research, 27(4), 367–382.  
Added by: Klaus-admin 08 Jun 2019 06:29:41 Asia/Singapore
Kułakowski, K. (2015). Notes on the existence of a solution in the pairwise comparisons method using the heuristic rating estimation approach. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 77(1-2), 105–121.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 07 Jun 2019 02:30:04 Asia/Singapore
Krejčí, J., & Stoklasa, J. (2018). Aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process: why weighted geometric mean should be used instead of weighted arithmetic mean. Expert Systems With Applications, 114, 97–106.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 01:34:09 Asia/Singapore
Koczkodaj, W. W., Herman, M. W., & Orlowski, M. (1999). Managing null entries in pairwise comparisons. Knowledge and Information Systems, 1(1), 119–125.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 00:44:06 Asia/Singapore
Karthekeyan, R., Venkatesan, K., & Chandrasekar, A. (2019). a comparison of strengths and weaknesses for analytical hierarchy process. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 9(3), 12–15.  
Added by: Klaus D. Goepel 13 Jul 2019 14:07:07 Asia/Singapore
1 - 20  |  21 - 40  |  41 - 60  |  61 - 80  |  81 - 100  |  101 - 107
wikindx 5.8.1 ©2019 | Total resources: 107 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: American Psychological Association (APA) | Database queries: 24 | DB execution: 0.19226 secs | Script execution: 1.18363 secs