BPMSG

List Resources

Displaying 1 - 18 of 18 (Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography)
Parameters
Publisher:  Elsevier
Order by:

Ascending
Descending
Use all checked: 
Use all displayed: 
Use all in list: 
Dong, Y., Zhang, G., Hong, W.-C., & Xu, Y. (2010). Consensus models for ahp group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method. Decision Support Systems, 49, 281–289.  
Added by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 23:19:16 Asia/Singapore
Edwards, W., & Barron, F. H. (1994). SMARTS and SMARTER: improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organizationol Behavior and Human Decision Process, 60(3), 306–325.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 07:03:08 Asia/Singapore
Grošelj, P., Stirn, L. Z., Ayrilmis, N., & Kuzman, M. K. (2015). Comparison of some aggregation techniques using group analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems With Applications, 42, 2198–2204.  
Added by: Klaus D. Goepel 07 Jun 2019 07:48:12 Asia/Singapore
Ishizaka, A., & Siraj, S. (2018). Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? an experimental comparative study of three methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(2), 462–471.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 06 Jun 2019 05:10:46 Asia/Singapore
Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems With Applications, 38(11), 14336–14345.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 07 Jun 2019 13:41:03 Asia/Singapore
Ivanco, M., Hou, G., & Michaeli, J. (2017). Sensitivity analysis method to address user disparities in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems With Applications, 90, 111–126.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 06 Jun 2019 01:06:52 Asia/Singapore
Krejčí, J., & Stoklasa, J. (2018). Aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process: why weighted geometric mean should be used instead of weighted arithmetic mean. Expert Systems With Applications, 114, 97–106.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 01:34:09 Asia/Singapore
Lee, J. W., & Kim, S. H. (2000). Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection. Computers & Operations Research, 27(4), 367–382.  
Added by: Klaus-admin 08 Jun 2019 06:29:41 Asia/Singapore
Lin, R., Lin, J. S.-J., Chang, J., Tang, D., Chao, H., & Julian, P. C. (2008). Note on group consistency in analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 190, 672–678.  
Added by: Klaus-admin 12 Jun 2019 01:18:36 Asia/Singapore
Meesariganda, B. R., & Ishizaka, A. (2017). Mapping verbal ahp scale to numerical scale for cloud computing strategy selection. Applied Soft Computing, 53, 111–118.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 08 Jun 2019 09:07:18 Asia/Singapore
Ramanathan, R., & Ganesh, L. S. (1995). Using AHP for resource allocation problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 80(2), 410–417.  
Added by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 07:17:41 Asia/Singapore
Rezaei, J. (2016). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method:some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126–130.  
Added by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 04:29:34 Asia/Singapore
Russo, R. D. F. S. M., & Camanho, R. (2015). Criteria in AHP: a systematic review. Procedia Computer Science, 50, 1123–1132.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 18 Jun 2019 04:48:55 Asia/Singapore
Russo, R. D. F. S. M., & Camanho, R. (2015). Criteria in AHP: a systematic review of literature. Information Technology and Quantitative Management, 55, 1123–1132.  
Last edited by: Klaus-admin 05 Oct 2019 17:16:59 Asia/Singapore
Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (1987). uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 32(1), 107–117.  
Last edited by: Klaus-admin 08 Jun 2019 06:15:06 Asia/Singapore
Sabaei, D., Erkoyuncu, J., & Roy, R. (2015). A review of multi-criteria decision making methods for enhanced maintenance delivery. Procedia CIRP, 37, 30–35.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 09 Jun 2019 03:25:53 Asia/Singapore
Tastle, W. J., & Wierman, M. J. (2007). Consensus and dissention: a measure of ordinal dispersion. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 45, 531–545.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 00:58:41 Asia/Singapore
Wijnmalen, D. J. D. (2007). Analysis of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR) with the AHP–ANP: a critical validation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46, 892–905.  
Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel 10 Jun 2019 00:15:28 Asia/Singapore
wikindx 5.8.1 ©2019 | Total resources: 107 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: American Psychological Association (APA) | Database queries: 22 | DB execution: 0.05593 secs | Script execution: 0.69492 secs