BPMSG |
Russo, R. D. F. S. M., & Camanho, R. (2015). Criteria in AHP: a systematic review. Procedia Computer Science, 50, 1123–1132. Added by: Klaus D. Goepel (18 Jun 2019 03:59:24 Asia/Singapore) Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel (18 Jun 2019 04:48:55 Asia/Singapore) |
Resource type: Journal Article Peer reviewed BibTeX citation key: Russo2015 Email resource to friend View all bibliographic details |
Categories: AHP/ANP Keywords: AHP application, alternatives, criteria, review Creators: Camanho, Russo Publisher: Elsevier Collection: Procedia Computer Science |
Views: 4/558 Views index: % Popularity index: 37.25% |
Abstract |
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is widely used by decision makers and researchers. The definition of criteria and the calculation of their weight are central in this method to assess the alternatives. However, there are few studies that focus on them. The purpose of this study is to develop a systematic review of literature on the real cases that applied AHP to evaluate how the criteria are being defined and measured. In the 33 cases selected, they mainly used literature to build the criteria and AHP or Fuzzy AHP to calculate their weight, while other techniques were used to evaluate alternatives. |
Notes |
Information Technology and Quantitative Management (ITQM 2015) |