BPMSG

WIKINDX Resources

Russo, R. D. F. S. M., & Camanho, R. (2015). Criteria in AHP: a systematic review. Procedia Computer Science, 50, 1123–1132. 
Added by: Klaus D. Goepel (18 Jun 2019 03:59:24 Asia/Singapore)   Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel (18 Jun 2019 04:48:55 Asia/Singapore)
Resource type: Journal Article
Peer reviewed
BibTeX citation key: Russo2015
Email resource to friend
View all bibliographic details
Categories: AHP/ANP
Keywords: AHP application, alternatives, criteria, review
Creators: Camanho, Russo
Publisher: Elsevier
Collection: Procedia Computer Science
Views: 2/17
Views index: %
Popularity index: 3%
Abstract

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is widely used by decision makers and researchers. The definition of criteria and the calculation of their weight are central in this method to assess the alternatives. However, there are few studies that focus on them. The purpose of this study is to develop a systematic review of literature on the real cases that applied AHP to evaluate how the criteria are being defined and measured. In the 33 cases selected, they mainly used literature to build the criteria and AHP or Fuzzy AHP to calculate their weight, while other techniques were used to evaluate alternatives.


  
Notes

Information Technology and Quantitative Management (ITQM 2015)


  
wikindx 5.8.1 ©2019 | Total resources: 100 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: American Psychological Association (APA) | Database queries: 47 | DB execution: 0.12706 secs | Script execution: 0.79704 secs