BPMSG

WIKINDX Resources

Russo, R. D. F. S. M., & Camanho, R. (2015). Criteria in AHP: a systematic review of literature. Information Technology and Quantitative Management, 55, 1123–1132. 
Added by: Klaus-admin (05 Oct 2019 17:15:13 Asia/Singapore)   Last edited by: Klaus-admin (05 Oct 2019 17:16:59 Asia/Singapore)
Resource type: Journal Article
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.081
BibTeX citation key: Russo2015a
Email resource to friend
View all bibliographic details
Categories: AHP/ANP
Keywords: AHP, AHP application, alternatives, criteria, group decision, group decision making
Creators: Camanho, Russo
Publisher: Elsevier
Collection: Information Technology and Quantitative Management
Views: 1/137
Views index: %
Popularity index: 15%
Abstract
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is widely used by decision makers and researchers. The definition of criteria and the calculation of their weight are central in this method to assess the alternatives. However, there are few studies that focus on them. The purpose of this study is to develop a systematic review of literature on the real cases that applied AHP to evaluate how the criteria are being defined and measured. In the 33 cases selected, they mainly used literature to build the criteria and AHP or Fuzzy AHP to calculate their weight, while other techniques were used to evaluate alternatives.
  
wikindx 5.8.1 ©2019 | Total resources: 107 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: American Psychological Association (APA) | Database queries: 49 | DB execution: 0.09843 secs | Script execution: 0.30873 secs