WIKINDX Resources

Whitaker, R. (2007). Validation examples of the analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7-8), 840–859. 
Added by: Klaus D. Goepel (06 Jun 2019 01:51:55 Asia/Singapore)   Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel (06 Jun 2019 01:53:34 Asia/Singapore)
Resource type: Journal Article
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.018
BibTeX citation key: Whitaker2007
Email resource to friend
View all bibliographic details
Categories: AHP/ANP
Keywords: Compatibility index, Validating AHP, Validating ANP, Validation, Validation examples
Creators: Whitaker
Collection: Mathematical and Computer Modelling
Views: 3/427
Views index: %
Popularity index: 10%
One way to validate a scientific theory is to show that the results predicted by the theory give correct answers; that is, that they match known results. In the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) this usually means finding examples with measures in an already known scale. To validate AHP priority vectors against measures from known scales the measures must first be normalized by dividing by their sum. When the two vectors are the same, or close, then one can say the results of the AHP model have been validated. The AHP and its generalization, the Analytic Network Process (ANP), can be validated at several levels ranging from priority vectors derived from pairwise comparison matrices to the synthesized priorities for a hierarchical model, to the priorities derived for the elements in an ANP network from the limiting supermatrix (perhaps most impressively validated by estimating market share of companies using intangible factors), to the overall results from complex ANP models involving several levels of networks. Many validation examples are presented along with a discussion of the compatibility index that can be used to measure closeness of priority vectors.
wikindx 5.8.1 ©2019 | Total resources: 107 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: American Psychological Association (APA) | Database queries: 45 | DB execution: 0.13556 secs | Script execution: 0.92564 secs