BPMSG

WIKINDX Resources

Ishizaka, A., & Siraj, S. (2018). Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? an experimental comparative study of three methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(2), 462–471. 
Added by: Klaus D. Goepel (06 Jun 2019 05:05:16 Asia/Singapore)   Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel (06 Jun 2019 05:10:46 Asia/Singapore)
Resource type: Journal Article
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.041
BibTeX citation key: Ishizaka2018
Email resource to friend
View all bibliographic details
Categories: AHP/ANP
Keywords: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), decision analysis, Experimental evaluation, MACBETH, SMART
Creators: Ishizaka, Siraj
Publisher: Elsevier
Collection: European Journal of Operational Research
Views: 5/217
Views index: %
Popularity index: 61.5%
Abstract
Many decision makers still question the usefulness of multi-criteria decision-making methods and prefer to rely on intuitive decisions. In this study we evaluated a number of multi-criteria decision-making tools for their usefulness using incentive-based experiments, which is a novel approach in operations research but common in psychology and experimental economics. In this experiment the participants were asked to compare five coffee shops to win a voucher for their best-rated shop. We found that, although the usefulness of different multi-criteria decision-making tools varied to some extent, all the tools were found to be useful in the sense that, when they decided to change their ranking, they followed the recommendation of the multi-criteria decision-making tool. Moreover, the level of inconsistency in the judgements provided had no significant effect on the usefulness of these tools.
  
wikindx 5.8.1 ©2019 | Total resources: 107 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: American Psychological Association (APA) | Database queries: 48 | DB execution: 0.14867 secs | Script execution: 0.85617 secs