WIKINDX Resources

Budescu, D. V., Zwick, R., & Rapoport, A. (1986). A comparison of the eigenvalue method and the geometric mean procedure for ratio scaling. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10(1), 69–78. 
Added by: Klaus D. Goepel (06 Jun 2019 13:33:33 Asia/Singapore)   Last edited by: Klaus-admin (08 Jun 2019 02:29:15 Asia/Singapore)
Resource type: Journal Article
DOI: 10.1177/014662168601000106
BibTeX citation key: Budescu1986
Email resource to friend
View all bibliographic details
Categories: AHP/ANP
Keywords: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), eigenvector method (EVM), geometric mean method
Creators: Budescu, Rapoport, Zwick
Collection: Applied Psychological Measurement
Views: 3/522
Views index: %
Popularity index: 12.25%
This article evaluates and compares the performance
of two ratio scaling methods, the eigenvalue method
proposed by Saaty (1977, 1980) and the geometric
mean procedure advocated by Williams and Crawford
(1980), given random data. The two methods were examined
in a series of monte carlo simulations for two
response methods (direct estimation and constant sum)
and various numbers of stimuli and response scales.
The sampling distributions of the measures of consistency
of the two methods were tabulated, rules for detecting
and rejecting inconsistent respondents are outlined,
and approximation formulas for other designs
are derived. Overall, there was a high level of agreement
and correspondence between the results from the
two scaling techniques even when the data were random.
wikindx 5.8.1 ©2019 | Total resources: 107 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: American Psychological Association (APA) | Database queries: 47 | DB execution: 0.17277 secs | Script execution: 0.95406 secs