|
BPMSG |
 |
|
Ssebuggwawo, D., Hoppenbrouwers, S., & Proper, H. A. 2010, Group decision making in collaborative modeling: Aggregating individual preferences with AHP. Paper presented at Digital Proceedings of the 4th SIKS conference in Enterprise Information Systems (EIS 2009). Added by: Klaus D. Goepel (07 Jun 2019 07:33:37 Asia/Singapore) Last edited by: Klaus-admin (08 Jun 2019 02:38:48 Asia/Singapore) |
| Resource type: Proceedings Article BibTeX citation key: Ssebuggwawo2010 Email resource to friend View all bibliographic details  |
Categories: AHP/ANP Keywords: aggregation of individual judgments (AIJ), aggregation of individual priorities (AIP), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), group aggregation, group decision making Creators: Hoppenbrouwers, Proper, Ssebuggwawo Collection: Digital Proceedings of the 4th SIKS conference in Enterprise Information Systems (EIS 2009) |
Views: 6/575 Views index: % Popularity index: 37.5% |
| Abstract |
|
The need for negotiation and decision making among col- laborative modelers stems from their desire to reconcile their di erent positions, priorities and preferences. This requires them to engage in an argumentative negotiation process so as to achieve consensus. A number of methods can be used to aggregate their judgements and priorities thus helping them to reach consensus. In this paper we show how the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) can be used to help modelers reach consensus about the quality of the di erent modeling aspects in a collaborative modeling process. Insights derived from this approach could be used to aid modelers reach consensus about the quality of the di erent aspects in a collaborative modeling session through a decision making negotiation process. |