BPMSG

WIKINDX Resources

Sabaei, D., Erkoyuncu, J., & Roy, R. (2015). A review of multi-criteria decision making methods for enhanced maintenance delivery. Procedia CIRP, 37, 30–35. 
Added by: Klaus D. Goepel (09 Jun 2019 03:24:14 Asia/Singapore)   Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel (09 Jun 2019 03:25:53 Asia/Singapore)
Resource type: Journal Article
Peer reviewed
DOI: 0.1016/j.procir.2015.08.086
BibTeX citation key: Sabaei2015
Email resource to friend
View all bibliographic details
Categories: AHP/ANP, Decision Making
Keywords: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), comparison, ELECTRE, PROMETHEE, review, TOPSIS
Creators: Erkoyuncu, Roy, Sabaei
Publisher: Elsevier
Collection: Procedia CIRP
Views: 17/152
Views index: %
Popularity index: 16.5%
Abstract
Conventionally there is a strong relation between manufacturing and services in complex engineering industries. For companies which aim to last in the competitive manufacturing market choosing appropriate decision making methods to improve their maintenance delivery has a vital role. The aim of this paper is to review Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) models, evaluate each method and do a critical comparison to assess them from a maintenance management point of view. The first section of this paper reviews MCDM methods in different literature, and then the second part develops a set of criteria to classify different techniques. At the end methods are compared based on developed criteria. This paper assesses different MCDM models, and provides a framework to select approaches for maintenance management.
  
Notes
AHP, PROMOTHEE, ELECTRE, SMART, TOPSIS - Good categorization of different MCDM
  
wikindx 5.8.1 ©2019 | Total resources: 107 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: American Psychological Association (APA) | Database queries: 52 | DB execution: 0.15928 secs | Script execution: 0.87824 secs