|
BPMSG |
 |
|
Sabaei, D., Erkoyuncu, J., & Roy, R. (2015). A review of multi-criteria decision making methods for enhanced maintenance delivery. Procedia CIRP, 37, 30–35. Added by: Klaus D. Goepel (09 Jun 2019 03:24:14 Asia/Singapore) Last edited by: Klaus D. Goepel (09 Jun 2019 03:25:53 Asia/Singapore) |
| Resource type: Journal Article Peer reviewed DOI: 0.1016/j.procir.2015.08.086 BibTeX citation key: Sabaei2015 Email resource to friend View all bibliographic details  |
Categories: AHP/ANP, Decision Making Keywords: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), comparison, ELECTRE, PROMETHEE, review, TOPSIS Creators: Erkoyuncu, Roy, Sabaei Publisher: Elsevier Collection: Procedia CIRP |
Views: 8/559 Views index: % Popularity index: 12.25% |
| Abstract |
|
Conventionally there is a strong relation between manufacturing and services in complex engineering industries. For companies which aim to last in the competitive manufacturing market choosing appropriate decision making methods to improve their maintenance delivery has a vital role. The aim of this paper is to review Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) models, evaluate each method and do a critical comparison to assess them from a maintenance management point of view. The first section of this paper reviews MCDM methods in different literature, and then the second part develops a set of criteria to classify different techniques. At the end methods are compared based on developed criteria. This paper assesses different MCDM models, and provides a framework to select approaches for maintenance management.
|
| Notes |
|
AHP, PROMOTHEE, ELECTRE, SMART, TOPSIS - Good categorization of different MCDM
|