BPMSG |
Cavallo, B., Ishizaka, A., Olivieri, M. G., & Squillante, M. (2018). Comparing inconsistency of pairwise comparison matrices depending on entries. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(5), 842–850. Added by: Klaus D. Goepel (10 Jun 2019 01:28:52 Asia/Singapore) |
Resource type: Journal Article DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2018.1464427 BibTeX citation key: Cavallo2018 Email resource to friend View all bibliographic details |
Categories: AHP/ANP, Decision Making Keywords: alo-group, consistency, pairwise comparison matrix Creators: Cavallo, Ishizaka, Olivieri, Squillante Collection: Journal of the Operational Research Society |
Views: 11/554 Views index: % Popularity index: 12.25% |
Abstract |
Pairwise comparisons have been a long standing technique for com- paring alternatives/criteria and their role has been pivotal in the development of modern decision making methods. Since several types of pairwise compar- ison matrices (e.g. multiplicative, additive, fuzzy) are proposed in literature, in this paper, we investigate, for which type of matrix, decision makers are more coherent when they express their subjective preferences. By performing an experiment, we found that the additive approach provides the worst level of coherence. |